Since the mid 1900s media violence has been an issue of debate, because of that many studies have been performed on the effect that this violence has on the youth of America. At first there was not such a huge problem because showing too much violence in the media was considered taboo, but as society has hungered for more interesting and exciting entertainment the appearance of violence has become extremely frequent and more violent. Therefore many people such as the Federal Communications Commission stepped up and said that there needed to be laws passed to regulate the violence that appears on the television so that the youth would not be influenced by this health issue. On the other hand others simply said that the parents need to supervise what their kids do and do not watch.
Those who support that the television should be regulated by the government believe this because of the substantial scientific evidence that they have amassed which deals with the health issues that affect the American youth due to violence on the television. They have surmised that children who watch violent images on the television are prone to act violently themselves while others might be desensitized to it. The glamorization of violence is largely charged with this affect on the youth because it sugar coats it and makes it seem like it is not a big deal and that it is acceptable. Supporters of television regulation believe that by regulating the programs which children are able to see will that they will live healthier better lives.
Though it is an undeniable fact violence on the television can have this affect on children, that doesn’t mean the right decision is to have government regulation on the television. Many who oppose government regulation feel that it is the parent’s job to determine what their children can and cannot watch. They believe that any action made to regulate violence on television would be a direct violation of the first amendment, the freedom of speech. Also even if they did decide to regulate it there would be no standard to which they could judge what exactly is violence and what is not. Finally, by regulating violence the government would be taking away the affect it has of portraying the truth and not covering up how life truly can be.